The Development Orthodoxy
by NSER Editorial Board on January 14, 2009
This paper traces the history and current state of international economic development through its institutions and attempts to reassess these institutions and their processes in a heterodox manner. There are many stereotypes and clichés to the foreign assistance industry: that it takes from the poor in rich countries and gives to the rich in poor countries; that it provides laboratories for economists and other social scientists to apply theories abroad that they would never attempt at home (the most obvious examples of these are population control programs and the privatization of pension funds); and that development creates “brain drain” from indigenous institutions to the very institutions of development itself. Although a brief summary of the major research programs in development is given, the paper does not attempt to disprove or confirm any of these or other research programs and their corresponding policy recommendations. The purpose of the paper is to question the very nature of international economic development through a historical and philosophical re-examination of its institutional constructs. The Hegelian dialectical method of analysis is applied to the institutions of economic evelopment and is used to ask, “what next and why?”
Weber, Cameron and Matthias Thiemann. 2007. “Questioning Development Orthodoxy.” New School Economic Review 2(1): 5-22
