<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New School Economic Review &#187; Academic Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newschooljournal.com/tag/academic-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newschooljournal.com</link>
	<description>A student run economics journal and open blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Let there be stoning&#8230; for bad presenters</title>
		<link>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/07/let-there-be-stoning-for-bad-presenters/</link>
		<comments>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/07/let-there-be-stoning-for-bad-presenters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog entries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschooljournal.com/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#8217;t it nice when you&#8217;ve been asking for better presentations in conferences and lectures and then suddenly you realise that you are wholly unoriginal and people have been thinking the same thing for 20+ years? Yes we have PresentationZen and Edward Tufte today, not to mention Hans Rosling and TED, but having just attended two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it nice when you&#8217;ve been asking for better presentations in conferences and lectures and then suddenly you realise that you are wholly unoriginal and people have been thinking the same thing for 20+ years?</p>
<p>Yes we have PresentationZen and Edward Tufte today, not to mention Hans Rosling and TED, but having just attended two international conferences these last two weeks, there is still a long way to go before we can catch up with <a href="http://www.geol.wwu.edu/rjmitch/stoning.pdf" target="_blank">Jay H. Lehr&#8217;s article &#8220;Let there be stoning!&#8221;</a> &#8211; what an excellent 4 page read.</p>
<p>Lehr, Jay H. 1985. &#8220;Let there be Stoning!&#8221; <em>Ground Water</em> <strong>23</strong>(2): 163-5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/07/let-there-be-stoning-for-bad-presenters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conference &#8216;Handbook&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/01/stiglers-conference-handbook/</link>
		<comments>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/01/stiglers-conference-handbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog entries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stigler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschooljournal.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Save some time at the next conference, just get this guide to comments and simply call out the number instead of the critique. Courtesy of George Stigler.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After attending a couple of conferences I started to notice that there are some criticisms which are repeated over and over again, for vastly different papers. It seems that George Stigler had the same problem quite a couple of years ago, and he very helpfully made a list for economics conference goers to spare us repeating the same thing over and over again. After thirty years, the list still rings true on a number of counts, for example:</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 91px"><img title="JPE" src="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/na101/home/literatum/publisher/uchicago/journals/covergifs/jpe/cover.gif" alt="The Journal of Political Economy" width="81" height="109" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Journal of Political Economy</p></div>
<p><strong>Introductory remarks by commentator</strong> [list A-H]:<br />
E. I can be very sympathetic to the author; until 2 years ago I was thinking the same thing</p>
<p><strong>The comments themselves</strong> [list 1-32]<br />
1. Adam Smith said that<br />
2. Unfortunately, there is an identification problem which is not dealt with adequately in the paper.<br />
11. I proved the main results in a paper many years ago<br />
22. What happens when you extend the analysis to the later (or earlier) period?<br />
32. The trouble with the present situation is that the property rights have not been fully assigned.</p>
<p>Stigler&#8217;s &#8216;handbook&#8217; is in the <em><a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/jpe/current" target="_blank">Journal of Political Economy</a></em>, but what might we add to the list, some thirty years after it was published?</p>
<p>Stigler, George. 1977. &#8220;The Conference Handbook.&#8221; <em>Journal of Political Economy</em> <strong>85</strong> (2): 441-3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newschooljournal.com/2009/01/stiglers-conference-handbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

