Comments for New School Economic Review

Comment on Heterodoxy at Oxford University Mr. Soros? by Karen Helveg

Karen Helveg — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:19:28 +0000

Do you really think that Easterly offers any glimmer of hope? For what? Overfresh remarks that he thinks controversial whereas he at every step mirrors standard economic theory? Just be a little micro’er and jazz it up with downhown homelies about yourself and your family as the quintessential economic unit.
Krugman and Stiglitz are at least Keynesians with some good old-fashioned knowledge. Have they seen the depth of it all? Certainly not. I fully agree that it is sad that Soros gives money the way he does, but what can be expected of a multibillionaire – even one who thinks that he is controversial?

Comment on ‘Middle class’ start at $40,000, so who’s poor? by Benjamin

Benjamin — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:59:56 +0000

That’s really interesting, and I hadn’t seen that. Would say that the figures aren’t quite the same, but the thinking is definitely similar, and my calculations do seem to be in harmony, at least with the broad definitions of ‘middle class’.

Thanks for the link, and for those following it, the middle class discussion starts around the minute counters 2:40. I don’t think I agree with putting the middle class definition just above the poverty line. Thoughts?

Comment on ‘Middle class’ start at $40,000, so who’s poor? by Brandt W

Brandt W — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:59:51 +0000

It’s remarkable how in harmony you are with factcheck.com’s vidcast

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/just-the-facts-2010-mailbag/

Comment on The problem with Money in economics by robbin_smith

robbin_smith — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 04:34:42 +0000

Hello to every online user of this site. this is not true , Some where economist and industrialist both are involved and the great sinner named federal bank of America ,who is the governing body of American financial providers. in this way we (investor) are also related to it because we want maximum profit on our stakes.
Robbin smith

Comment on The problem with Money in economics by Tweets that mention New School Economic Review » The problem with Money in economics -- Topsy.com

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:08:33 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Patrick Baird. Patrick Baird said: #TheNewSchool New School Economic Review » The problem with Money in economics: Websites. New School History of Th… http://bit.ly/deRFiE [...]

Comment on Don’t blame the economists for the crisis… by Mea Culpa « Gaceta de un Universitario

Mea Culpa « Gaceta de un Universitario — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:38:46 +0000

[...] Dirección de la Imagen: http://newschooljournal.com/2009/05/dont-blame-the-economists-for-the-crisis/ [...]

Comment on Visualize this by Distance learning since 1858 « History of Economics Playground

Distance learning since 1858 « History of Economics Playground — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:36:47 +0000

[...] just because I was talking about visualisations becoming the new ‘thing’ in economics elsewhere, but it’s something we are slowly seeing in a few sessions at the HES conference, and now [...]

Comment on Hello 2010, goodbye Prof. Samuelson by New School Economic Review » Hello 2010, goodbye Prof. Samuelson School

New School Economic Review » Hello 2010, goodbye Prof. Samuelson School — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:54:28 +0000

[...] Read more: New School Economic Review » Hello 2010, goodbye Prof. Samuelson [...]

Comment on Scroogenomics, Bah Humbug by New School Economic Review » Scroogenomics, Bah Humbug School

New School Economic Review » Scroogenomics, Bah Humbug School — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:48:56 +0000

[...] Go here to read the rest: New School Economic Review » Scroogenomics, Bah Humbug [...]

Comment on Long time no see – and merry Christmas by Benjamin

Benjamin — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:29:05 +0000

Sorry about that, and thank you for the kind words, puts a smile on my face and we are as ever happy to oblige :)